Those who admit that understood Relativity, automatly admit that understood nonsense.

No deficiency of knowledge is able to switch off my brain

By observation no alteration ((!))

Don't touch time! Time doesn't tick, only clocks do.

Updating my page I decided to preserve the word 'theory' in its title in order it would not be taken for topically another one.

Science, in spite of the huge progress, which has lately been made, still doesn't give us a sufficiently probable description of the Universe and origin of its material part. In return, we get every now and again new and more complicated theories. Sorely disappointed by this situation, I have decided to apply myself to this problem and not to rest until this mystery is solved. I hope I've succeeded to a certain degree. I'd like to stress that I'm not a physicist but an economist. Nevertheless, on the basis of generally available knowledge, I started to brood over this problem, guided by my own way of thinking, and intuition which was a grate help. At the same time I tried to ensure that the final description presented by me would not be in conflict with science. My basic way of thinking was to find the simplest solution. This, which I present beneath, differs considerably from the models of the Universe described by science.

Cosmology needs radical reconstruction because is based on false hypotheses. The false hypotheses gave birth to false theories, and all this mess is caused due to lack of imagination of what time is. Contemporary Cosmology is abundant in myths that became rooted over 100 years ago and is unable to perform a baby's step forward. Summing up, physics should let Relativity down without any further delay in order to move a step in proper direction. Relativity is based on hypotheses and theories which cannot be considered as laws of physics as long as they remain hypotheses and theories.

The present page is a clipping of information about surrounding the world. It was created with a purpose to disavow scientific myths, constituting false hypotheses, about which I have been discussing on various forums since couple of years and explain them in my simple books "Definition of Time", published in January 2006 and "Three Indispensable Steps to the Theory of Everything", October 2009. 

The first confirmation that something was going to happen, had been May 2005 silence, the year of centennial of famous Einstein's papers. Unfortunately, as far as by now, science doesn't give a univocal attitude towards supporting or rejecting so-called Relativity, which I consider for the biggest mistake ever in the history of science. Below are my theses: